February 2007

Greenpeace - Greenpeace flotilla blockades nuclear base as Labour MPs attempt to sail on Trident ships, February 2007

date: 
23 February, 2007

Seven Greenpeace boats have blockaded the Trident nuclear weapons submarine base at Faslane in Scotland as Labour MPs prepare to board one of the nuclear armed vessels and set sail in a government PR push.

At the same time Tony Blair is further ratcheting up international tension by supporting Bush's proposed Star Wars system that will lead to a new arms race.

This morning the Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise out-manoeuvred MoD ships and is now anchored across the entrance to the base. Meanwhile six smaller blocking boats have dropped off Greenpeace volunteers in canoes who are attempting to scale HMS Vigilant, one of the UK's four Vanguard nuclear weapons subs berthed at Faslane.

The Greenpeace boats will attempt to hold their position and prevent Labour MPs from setting sail on board the Vigilant in a government sponsored PR voyage. Campaigners aboard the Arctic Sunrise are inviting the MPs to instead come aboard the Greenpeace ship to learn about the real threats facing the world such as climate change, and how the billions earmarked for Trident could instead be used to develop a low-carbon economy. The stand-off is now underway at the base.

An email acquired by Greenpeace, from the Parliamentary aide of Defence Secretary Des Browne to MPs, reads: "Colleagues may be interested to know that there is an opportunity to visit the Faslane naval base and sail on a Vanguard submarine from Friday 23rd February (base visit) and until Saturday 24th February (sailing)."

Tony Blair is on the verge of pushing proposals through Parliament to spend &76 billion on the building and servicing of a new generation of nuclear weapons. A Westminster vote on Trident is expected within a few weeks. Tomorrow will see massive demonstrations against Trident in London and Glasgow.

Louise Edge, Greenpeace campaigner on board the Arctic Sunrise, said: "We're blockading the base because these nuclear arms submarines pose a threat to the security of the world, not least by encouraging other countries to go nuclear in the future. The Labour MPs who have been invited to Faslane should abandon their Trident jolly and come on board the Sunrise and hear the truth about weapons of mass destruction.

"Tony Blair is playing a dangerous game by saying to countries like North Korea that nuclear weapons are necessary for national defence, that the UK doesn't care about its international legal obligations, and that nuclear proliferation is the way forward. He is sending a message to the world that might be welcomed in the capital of North Korea but will be widely condemned by people who want to end nuclear proliferation."

Polling commissioned by Greenpeace and released today shows that 78 per cent of people in Gordon Brown's and Douglas Alexander's constituencies think it's wrong to spend up to &76 billion on a replacement for Trident. 45 per cent of respondents said they would not continue to support the party they voted for in the last election if that party supported plans to replace Trident. Scotland, home to the UK's nuclear weapons, has no independent say as to whether the Trident system is renewed.

Greenpeace is appealing to MPs in the forthcoming Commons vote, expected mid-March, to listen to their constituents. Louise Edge continued: "We need to make the world a safer, not more dangerous place. That means showing a lead by marginalising nuclear weapons. The tens of billions of pounds Blair wants to spend on these terrifying weapons of mass destruction could instead make our country the world leader in fighting climate change."

Greenpeace wants to see the UK's Trident submarine taken off patrol and their warheads stored in an internationally monitored site.

The campaign to rid the world of nuclear weapons has received support across the political spectrum.

Kofi Annan says of Tony Blair's policy: "They should not imagine that this will be accepted as compatible with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty."

Former shadow Defence Secretary Michael Ancram says: "The threat of using nuclear weapons is not only illogical but incredible... the need for genuinely independent alternative and flexible non-nuclear deterrence is if anything greater."

Professor Stephen Hawking says: "To replace Trident would make it more difficult to get arms reduction. It would also be a waste of money because there are no circumstances in which we would use it independently."

The UN's nuclear watchdog Mohammed El-Baradei said earlier this week that Britain cannot "modernise its Trident submarines and then tell everyone else that nuclear weapons are not needed in the future". He added: "We need to treat nuclear weapons the way we treat slavery or genocide. There needs to be a taboo over possessing them."

Greenpeace was born in 1971 when campaigners chartered a boat and sailed into a test site off Alaska where President Nixon was preparing to explode a nuclear weapon in the atmosphere. The Greenpeace flagship Rainbow Warrior was this week refused entry into Iran where its crew intended to campaign for a nuclear free Middle East.

Onboard the flotilla of boats blockading Faslane are campaigners from Scotland, England, Brazil, Argentina, Australia, Russia, Hungary, Canada, Holland, Colombia, Italy, India, France and Germany.

ENDS

For more call Greenpeace on 07867 647041 or 07796 947452 or 07939 245864 or 020 7865 8255

Ship sat phone +871 3244 53810

Photo and video of blockade available

Notes: detailed polling was undertaken by Edinburgh-based 2Collaborate Research. The company polled 460 individuals in just these two constituencies. The average number of people questioned for a national Scottish poll is 1000 over 59 constituencies. Gordon Brown's constituency is Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath. Douglas Alexander, Minister for Scotland, represents the constituency of Paisley and Renfrewshire South. Full polling results are available from the Greenpeace press office.

http://www.greenpeace.org.uk

Commons Hansard - debates - Prime Minister: Column 260

date: 
21 February, 2007

Debates
Prime Minister
Column 260
Mr. Chris Mullin (Sunderland, South) (Lab):
What is my right hon. Friend’s response to Mohamed el-Baradei of the International Atomic Energy Agency, who said recently that Britain could not modernise its Trident missile system and then credibly tell countries such as Iran that they do not need nuclear weapons?

The Prime Minister: I should remind my hon. Friend of the non-proliferation treaty, which makes it absolutely clear that Britain has the right to possess nuclear weapons. As Mohamed el-Baradei is the custodian of that treaty’s implementation, I think it would be a good idea for him to act accordingly.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhn0702.htm

Parliamentary Answers: Nuclear Weapons, February 2007

date: 
6 February, 2007

Column 788W
Nuclear Weapons
Mr. Alan Reid:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what factors were taken into account in reaching the conclusion in the White Paper on the future of the UK's nuclear deterrent that the upper limit on the number of operationally available warheads should be 160; and what (a) methodology and (b) calculations were used in reaching that conclusion. [119285]

Des Browne: As we said in paragraph 4-9 of the White Paper ‘The Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear Deterrent’, Official Report, column 6994, published on 4 December, in determining the scale of minimum nuclear deterrent,

"We need to make a judgment on the minimum destructive capability necessary to provide an effective deterrent posture. This judgment requires an assessment of the decision-making processes of future potential aggressors, and an analysis of the effectiveness of the defensive measures that they might employ."

The new upper limit of less than 160 operationally available warheads reflects the results of that judgment, together with our NATO commitments, and the way in which we operate the deterrent submarines. I am withholding further details as its disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice the defence of the United Kingdom.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhn0702.htm

Parliamentary Answers: Nuclear Weapons, February 2007

date: 
8 February, 2007

Column 1072W
Nuclear Weapons
Colin Challen:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much his Department has spent on the public consultation on the replacement for the Trident system. [119983]

Des Browne: I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Pendle (Mr. Prentice) on 18 December 2006, Official Report, column 1491W.

Since then, I have given a detailed speech at Kings College, London, we have staged a full debate in the House of Lords and I have given wide-ranging evidence to the House of Commons Defence Committee. We have also responded to many enquiries from members of the public. The costs of these activities cannot be separately identified.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhn0702.htm

Parliamentary Answers: Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, February 2007

date: 
19 February, 2007

Column 402W
Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty
Jeremy Corbyn:
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what policy statement will be made by UK representatives at the non-proliferation treaty preparatory committee meeting in Geneva in May; and if she will make a statement. [120811]

Dr. Howells:
No final decision has yet been made on the number and content of any statements that the UK will make at the nuclear non-proliferation treaty preparatory committee in Vienna in May. We expect that, at a minimum, we will make a national statement during the opening plenary session. A copy of this statement will be placed in the Library of the House.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhn0702.htm

Parliamentary Answers: Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, February 2007

date: 
19 February, 2007

Column 402W
Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty
Jeremy Corbyn:
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs who she expects to represent the UK at the non-proliferation treaty preparatory committee meeting in Geneva in May. [120810]

Dr. Howells: The UK delegation to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty preparatory committee in Vienna in May will be headed by Ambassador John Duncan, the United Kingdom’s Permanent Representative to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva. He will be accompanied by officials from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the Ministry of Defence and the Department of Trade and Industry. No decision has yet been made on Ministerial attendance.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhn0702.htm

Parliamentary Answers: Trident, February 2007

date: 
19 February, 2007

Column 323W
Trident
Colin Challen:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will extend the consultation period on the proposed replacement for Trident by three months. [120862]

Des Browne: On 4 December, Official Report, column 21, the Prime Minister said that there would be “a very full process of debate”. The Government have contributed to this debate in a number of different ways: for example, we have published a comprehensive White Paper; we have staged a full debate in the House of Lords; I have given a speech at King’s College London; we have given wide-ranging evidence to the Defence Committee; and we have arranged visits for hon. Members to the Faslane Naval Base. Further events are also planned.

It remains our intention, at the conclusion of the process, to have a full debate and vote in the House of Commons. No precise date has yet been fixed but it is likely to be in March.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhn0702.htm

Parliamentary Answers: Members: Correspondence, February 2007

date: 
19 February, 2007

Column 281W
Members: Correspondence
Peter Bottomley:
To ask the Prime Minister when he will respond to the letter of 3 February 2007 to him from Meeting for Sufferings, on the proposed replacement of the Trident nuclear weapons system. [120661]

The Prime Minister:
As far as I am aware, my Office has not received the letter.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhn0702.htm

Parliamentary Answers: Nuclear Weapons: Proliferation, February 2007

date: 
19 February, 2007

Column 223W
Nuclear Weapons: Proliferation
Mr. Chaytor:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what progress has been made on each of the 13 practical steps towards nuclear disarmament agreed at the 2000 non-proliferation treaty review conference. [118565]

Des Browne:
I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave on 8 January 2007, Official Report, column 97W, to the hon. Member for North Devon (Nick Harvey).

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhn0702.htm

Parliamentary Answers: Nuclear Weapons, February 2007

date: 
19 February, 2007

Column 223W
Nuclear Weapons
Peter Bottomley:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what steps the Government have taken since the 2005 Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference to pursue good faith negotiations for nuclear disarmament. [120660]

Des Browne: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave most recently in evidence to the House of Commons Defence Select Committee on 6 February.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmhn0702.htm