Legal

Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland

Memorandum submitted to the Defence Select Committee by Steven Haines

Date: 
1 February, 2007
Source: 
http://www.publications.parliament.uk

Memorandum submitted to the Defence Select Committee by Steven Haines for the inquiry 'The Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear Deterrent: the White Paper'.

Lawyers evidence to Defence Select Committee

Date: 
30 January, 2007
Source: 
http://www.publications.parliament.uk

Uncorrected transcript of oral evidence to be published as HC 225-iii
 
The Future of the UK'S Strategic Nuclear Deterrent: The White Paper
Professor Christopher Greenwood QC, Professor Nick Grief, Professor Steven Haines and Professor Phillipe Sands
 
Evidence heard in Public Questions 209 - 311

Peacerights - letter on Trident Replacement

Date: 
27 November, 2006
Source: 
http://www.peacerights.org

The following letter was co-ordinated by Peacerights, and published in the The Guardian, 27th November 2006

Greenpeace - Opinion on legality of Trident replacement, November 2006

date: 
13 November, 2006

The United Kingdom's Nuclear Deterrent: current and future issues of legality

An independent, authoritative legal opinion from top international law expert Philippe Sands QC, showing that the renewal, replacement, upgrading and sub-strategic use of the UK's Trident nuclear deterrent may breach Article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the UN Charter and international humanitarian law. The opinion draws on the 1996 decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the legality of nuclear weapons, the NPT and public statements by the UK government on the use and justification of its nuclear weapons.
Philippe Sands QC, Helen Law
Matrix
http://www.greenpeace.org.uk

NIS - NFLA: Orion NoPD unlawful

Date: 
18 January, 2006
Source: 
http://www.nuclearinfo.org

 
Widespread Opposition to new nuclear weapons research facilities at AWE Aldermaston
COUNCILS THROUGHOUT THE UK OPPOSE THE ALDERMASTON ORION LASER: COUNCILS FOR THE MAJOR CITIES OF GLASGOW, EDINBURGH, MANCHESTER, LEEDS AND LONDON (GLA) AS WELL AS THE LOCAL COUNCILS OF SLOUGH, READING AND OXFORD ASSOCIATED WITH THE GROWING OPPOSITION.

Peacerights - Joint Opinion on Trident Replacement, December 2005

date: 
19 December, 2005

Rabinder Singh QC, Prof. Christine Chinkin, Matrix Chambers

The Maintenance and Possible Replacement of the Trident Nuclear Missile System
Introduction and Summary of Advice

1. We are asked to advise Peacerights on the legality under international law of the United Kingdom's actions with respect to the Trident nuclear missile system. The question on which our advice is sought is whether the UK is in breach of international law through maintenance of the Trident system or the replacement of that system by one with a similar yield. More specifically advice is sought on (i) whether Trident or a likely replacement to Trident breaches customary international law and (ii) whether the replacement of Trident would breach the Non-Proliferation Treaty 1967 (NPT), article VI.

2. In our opinion, for the reasons which are set out below:
(1) The use of the Trident system would breach customary international law, in particular because it would infringe the "intransgressible" requirement that a distinction must be drawn between combatants and non-combatants.

(2) The replacement of Trident is likely to constitute a breach of article VI of the NPT.

(3) Such a breach would be a material breach of that treaty.
http://www.peacerights.org/reports/195

Peace Rights - Inquiry into Legality of Nuclear Weapons, November 2004

date: 
8 November, 2004

Report of the Inquiry into the Legality of Nuclear Weapons
King's College London
6-8 November 2004
http://www.peacerights.org/reports

Peacerights - Joint advice on MDA and NPT, July 2004

date: 
20 July, 2004

Mutual Defence Agreement and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Peacerights, BASIC and the Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy

Joint advice on whether the UK is in breach of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty by its renewal of the Mutual Defence Agreement with the USA.
Rabinder Singh QC, Professor Christine Chinkin, Matrix
http://www.peacerights.org

NIS - Legal Opinion on AWE NoPD for laser research facility, December 2006

Date: 
17 December, 2003
Source: 
http://nuclearinfo.org/legal

ADVICE ON EIA
1. The issue is whether this NoPD requires EIA.

NFLA - Legal Issues Affecting AWE Aldermaston, June 2003

date: 
20 June, 2003

Paper by Jamie Woolley, NFLA Legal Adviser presented at the NFLA English Forum Special Seminar on AWE Aldermaston covering planning legal issues.